A senior manager announces his decision to move to a competitor and
the senior management team convenes a crisis-management meeting to
figure how the organization will survive. Meanwhile, for the rest of
the team, it's party time! The champagne is flowing; everyone's
wearing funny hats, blowing noisemakers, and toasting their good
fortune. The topic du jour is "With that clown gone, maybe now we
can get on with business."
What happened? How can
someone so valued by senior management work so badly with the troops
on the ground? The reality is most senior managers have no awareness
of how they or their fellow managers perceive them throughout their
organizations – even at a time when so much is spoken about
achievement of corporate goals through team-based efforts. No wonder
that more than 30 percent of all people changing jobs are doing so
to get away from their bosses. They're not leaving their jobs –
they're leaving their managers!
This sort of disaster can happen only in an environment where the
performance of management is appraised using traditional boss-down
appraisals, with performance of managers assessed only by their
direct bosses. This traditional approach means that the views of
those who most directly experience the effectiveness (or
otherwise) of a manager's performance – peers and direct reports –
are never tapped. If your success depends to any extent upon your
team, that's just not acceptable any more.
Every year, more than 250,000 managers worldwide use the
Profiles Checkpoint Multi-Rater Feedback System – a system
that provides managers and leaders with an opportunity to receive
an evaluation of their job performance from the people around them
– their boss, their peers (fellow managers), and their direct
reports (the people whose work they supervise). From this
feedback, managers can compare the opinions of others with their
own perceptions, positively identify their strengths, and pinpoint
the areas of their job performance that need improvement.
The Profiles Checkpoint process is concerned with a manager's
job performance in eight universal leadership and management
competencies, and 18 skill sets:
|
Communication
- Listens to others
- Processes information
- Communicates effectively
Adaptability
- Adjusts to circumstances
- Thinks creatively
Task
Management
- Works efficiently
- Works competently
Development of Others
- Cultivates individual talents
- Motivates successfully
|
Leadership
- Instills trust
- Provides direction
- Delegates responsibility
Relationships
- Builds personal relationships
- Facilitates team success
Production
- Takes action
- Achieves results
Personal Development
- Displays commitment
- Seeks improvement
|
How Does it Work?
Each participant completes an evaluation – a process that takes
about 15 minutes. Participants are guaranteed anonymity (except
for the boss) and urged to be honest and objective in their
responses. Participants complete their feedback via the Internet,
or on paper if desired, and results from all participants are
compiled in a report that is returned to the manager.
Checkpoint reports have colorful graphs and useful
charts, as well as narrative descriptions of the results, to help
the manager to read, understand and effectively use the data for
self-development. The report has a special personal-growth section
that coaches the manager and helps improve performance in
development areas.
The Checkpoint report also encourages managers to link
directly into an online system called Checkpoint SkillBuilder,
which takes them through the step-by-step process of developing a
comprehensive and personalized development plan. You can read more
about the checkpoint system on the Web at
www.hrihouston.com or call us at
713-840-6350.
Round and Round…
The upshot is a more detailed and objective assessment of a
manager's strengths, and of any areas where additional development
might be required. This assessment then forms the basis of a
development plan between managers and their bosses – whereas the
managers are fully aware of the dynamics of their relationships
with the people around them, they are also effectively locked into
the organization by the commitment of the organization to their
ongoing skill development.
After a period of six or 12 months, the process is run again;
the effectiveness of the development plan is assessed; and new
development goals are set for the following period.
Multi-Rater Feedback vs.
Boss-Down Appraisals
There are several reasons managers at all levels are eagerly
embracing this approach to performance appraisal.
Equitable
For the manager being appraised, Multi-Rater appraisals
differ from boss-down appraisals in the same way that judge and
jury courts differ from "hanging-judge" courts. Managers benefit
from a wide variety of feedback upon their actual job performance,
and, to be deemed top-performing managers, are no longer solely
dependent upon the extent to which they have developed a good
rapport with their direct boss.
Proven Effectiveness
For the appraising boss, a positive change is more
likely when an appraisal draws upon multiple sources trusted by
the manager. Multi-Rater appraisals have been shown to be
more effective than boss-down appraisals in driving a manager to
make necessary behavioral changes or to improve management skills.
If your boss says you need some improvement in some particular
area, you may think, "What would she know?" or explain it
away as a personality thing. If, however, 11 different people of
your choosing – people with whom you work closely and whose views
you trust and value – send you the same message, you really have
to listen.
Team Motivation
Multi-Rater Feedback systems also have a positive
team-building effect. Research has proven the motivating value of
the exercise for those involved as reviewers. Your people are sent
a clear message that their opinions are valued, and they can help
effect positive change in the management where required.
Traditional reviews have given way to this much more effective
tool for management development, as Fortune 500 organizations are
mandating their use.
Used regularly as an integral part of a strategic development
plan, 360-degree appraisals can lead to more consistent management
development, better alignment of corporate goals with
personal-development objectives, more open communication, and
better team balance.
*From the book 40 STRATEGIES FOR WINNING IN
BUSINESS by Bud Haney and Jim Sirbasku. © S&H Publishing
Co., 5205 Lake Shore Drive, Waco, Texas 76710-1732. All rights
reserved. Contact S&H Publishing Co., (254) 751-1644, for reprint
permission.